tools: welcome first-time contributors - #65533
Conversation
Add contribution guidance and an advisory AgentScan warning for first-time pull request authors. Signed-off-by: Filip Skokan <panva.ip@gmail.com>
|
Review requested:
|
jasnell
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Worth a try to see if it's effective
It can be a prose in the text. I wouldn't run expensive policy queries in this workflow. Please make a suggestion. |
Thanks for the response! The text is fine for the first contribution, and if they have read the guidance, they shouldn't be submitting multiple PRs anyway. I hadn't considered the cost of additional queries and I understand your concern. So I'm not going to suggest a change after all! |
|
Example run: nodejs/node-auto-test#100 (comment) Example with positive agentscan: nodejs/node-auto-test#101 (comment) (sorry for accidentally closing, was on the wrong tab 😞) |
I'll reflow the caution block |
|
@Renegade334 can you test again? |
|
Landed in 0befff5 |
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
|
@MikeMcC399 The workflow actually ran, didn't need approval but author_association was |
|
I've disabled the workflow for now while searching for a workaround. |
|
I'm also suspicious at the moment of GitHub results, as we've discussed in Slack concerning problems with cron jobs and cloning into Jenkins. |
|
Ok, i'll re-enable the workflow and observe for a bit before following up with using |
This comment was marked as resolved.
This comment was marked as resolved.
This comment was marked as resolved.
This comment was marked as resolved.
This comment was marked as resolved.
This comment was marked as resolved.
|
Followup in #65592. I wouldn't fast-track it, if anything the two days will give us more opportunity to observe the behaviour. |

Add contribution guidance and an advisory AgentScan warning for first-time pull request authors.